Can the Trust Pay for Self-Defense or Situational Awareness Classes?

As a San Diego trust attorney, Ted Cook frequently receives questions about permissible trust expenses. Clients often wonder if funds held within their trusts can be used for things seemingly outside of traditional needs like healthcare or housing—things like personal enrichment or, as is increasingly common, self-defense training. The answer, like many legal questions, isn’t a simple yes or no. It heavily depends on the specific trust document and the trustee’s prudent interpretation of its terms. Generally, if the trust allows for expenses that enhance the beneficiary’s quality of life or safety, and the trustee deems the expense reasonable, self-defense classes could be a valid expenditure. Approximately 31% of Americans express concern about personal safety in their neighborhoods, making this a relevant consideration for many trust beneficiaries.

What constitutes a “reasonable” expense within a trust?

The concept of a “reasonable” expense is crucial. Trustees have a fiduciary duty to manage trust assets responsibly. This means acting with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in similar circumstances. A lavish, overly expensive self-defense course might not be considered reasonable, but a practical, well-regarded course focused on situational awareness and basic self-defense techniques likely would be. The trustee must consider the beneficiary’s individual needs, the overall financial situation of the trust, and the potential benefits of the training. For instance, if the beneficiary lives in an area with high crime rates or has experienced a traumatic event, the argument for covering self-defense training becomes stronger. It is essential to document the trustee’s reasoning for approving such an expense, creating a clear record of prudent decision-making.

How do trust terms impact permissible expenses?

The language within the trust document is paramount. Some trusts broadly define permissible expenses, allowing for anything that benefits the beneficiary’s “health, education, maintenance, and support.” Others are much more specific, listing only allowed expenditures. If the trust explicitly excludes personal enrichment activities, covering self-defense training could be problematic. Conversely, if the trust includes a catch-all provision allowing for expenses that enhance the beneficiary’s well-being, the trustee has more discretion. Ted Cook always advises clients during estate planning to consider including broader language regarding permissible expenses to provide flexibility for future needs and circumstances. A well-drafted trust anticipates potential scenarios and empowers the trustee to make informed decisions without constant court intervention.

Can a trustee be held liable for approving inappropriate expenses?

Absolutely. Trustees have a fiduciary duty, and breaching that duty can lead to legal repercussions. If a trustee approves an expense that is not authorized by the trust document or is deemed imprudent, they could be held personally liable for the amount spent. Beneficiaries can petition the court to remove a trustee who has mismanaged trust assets or failed to act in their best interests. This is why careful documentation and a thorough understanding of the trust document are crucial. Ted Cook often advises trustees to seek legal counsel before approving any unusual or potentially questionable expense to minimize the risk of liability. A proactive approach to trust administration can prevent costly legal battles and protect the interests of all beneficiaries.

What about expenses for related safety equipment?

The permissibility of expenses extends beyond the cost of the classes themselves. Items such as personal alarms, pepper spray, or even self-defense keychains could potentially be covered if they are directly related to the training and enhance the beneficiary’s safety. However, again, the trustee must exercise reasonable judgment and consider the overall cost. Purchasing high-end tactical gear might be deemed excessive, while a basic personal alarm could be considered a reasonable and prudent expense. The key is to demonstrate a clear connection between the expense and the beneficiary’s well-being and safety. Ted Cook often sees a rise in this type of inquiry particularly as individuals focus more on preparedness and personal safety in a changing world.

I remember Mr. Henderson, a kind man who built a beautiful trust for his granddaughter, Lily. He specifically outlined funds for education and healthcare. Lily, a vibrant college student, became fascinated with Krav Maga after a frightening incident near campus. She requested funds from the trust to cover the classes. The initial trustee, an old family friend unfamiliar with the nuances of trust law, denied the request, deeming it a “non-essential luxury.” Lily, understandably upset, felt her grandfather would have wanted her to feel safe, but the trustee stuck to a rigid interpretation of the trust document. It required legal intervention, and costly court fees, to prove the trustee had acted in error and to unlock the funds for Lily’s training.

What if the trust is silent on the issue of self-defense training?

When the trust document doesn’t explicitly address self-defense training, the trustee must rely on their judgment and a thorough understanding of the beneficiary’s needs and the trust’s overall purpose. They must consider whether the expense aligns with the broad intent of the trust, which is typically to provide for the beneficiary’s well-being and security. It’s also important to consider the prevailing circumstances. In a situation where the beneficiary lives in a dangerous area or faces specific threats, the argument for covering self-defense training becomes stronger. Ted Cook always suggests a trustee consult with legal counsel in these ambiguous situations to ensure they are acting prudently and protecting themselves from potential liability.

I recall Mrs. Davison, a recent widow, whose husband meticulously built a trust for her benefit. After his passing, she felt incredibly vulnerable. She signed up for a situational awareness course to empower herself and feel safer. The new trustee, a tech-savvy attorney, initially hesitated but after I explained how the course was directly related to Mrs. Davison’s peace of mind and overall well-being, he approved the expense. Mrs. Davison thrived in the course, gaining confidence and a renewed sense of security. She often spoke about how the trust not only provided for her financial needs but also empowered her to live a fuller, safer life. It was a perfect example of how a trust, thoughtfully administered, can truly enhance a beneficiary’s quality of life.

In conclusion, whether a trust can pay for self-defense or situational awareness classes is not a black-and-white answer. It depends on the specific trust document, the trustee’s prudent judgment, and the beneficiary’s individual needs. Ted Cook emphasizes the importance of clear, comprehensive trust drafting and careful administration to ensure that the trust fulfills its intended purpose and provides for the beneficiary’s well-being in all aspects of their life. Seeking legal counsel is crucial for both trustees and beneficiaries to navigate these complex issues and protect their interests.


Who Is Ted Cook at Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.:

Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.

2305 Historic Decatur Rd Suite 100, San Diego CA. 92106

(619) 550-7437

Map To Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC, a living trust lawyer: https://maps.app.goo.gl/JiHkjNg9VFGA44tf9


src=”https://www.google.com/maps/embed?pb=!1m18!1m12!1m3!1d3356.1864302092154!2d-117.21647!3d32.73424!2m3!1f0!2f0!3f0!3m2!1i1024!2i768!4f13.1!3m3!1m2!1s0x80deab61950cce75%3A0x54cc35a8177a6d51!2sPoint%20Loma%20Estate%20Planning%2C%20APC!5e0!3m2!1sen!2sus!4v1744077614644!5m2!1sen!2sus” width=”100%” height=”350″ style=”border:0;” allowfullscreen=”” loading=”lazy” referrerpolicy=”no-referrer-when-downgrade”>

best probate attorney in San Diego best probate lawyer in San Diego

About Point Loma Estate Planning:



Secure Your Legacy, Safeguard Your Loved Ones. Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.

Feeling overwhelmed by estate planning? You’re not alone. With 27 years of proven experience – crafting over 25,000 personalized plans and trusts – we transform complexity into clarity.

Our Areas of Focus:

Legacy Protection: (minimizing taxes, maximizing asset preservation).

Crafting Living Trusts: (administration and litigation).

Elder Care & Tax Strategy: Avoid family discord and costly errors.

Discover peace of mind with our compassionate guidance.

Claim your exclusive 30-minute consultation today!


If you have any questions about: What is an irrevocable trust and how does it differ from a revocable trust? Please Call or visit the address above. Thank you.